Ihre Suche

Sprache
Thema

Ergebnisse 3 Einträge

  • Improving our learning abilities is important for numerous aspects of our life. Several studies found beneficial effects of presenting cues (odor or sounds) during learning and during sleep for memory performance. A recent study applying a real-life paradigm indicated that additional odor cueing during a Final Test can further increase this cueing effect. The present online study builds on these findings with the following questions: (1) Can we replicate beneficial memory effects of additional odor cueing during tests? (2) How many odor cueing learning sessions and odor cueing nights of sleep maximize the learning success? (3) Can odor cueing also reduce the amount of forgetting over time? 160 Participants learned 40 German Japanese word pairs in four groups with separate experimental conditions over three days. Group N received no odor during the whole study. Group LS received odor cueing during learning and sleep, group LT during learning and testing and group LST during learning, sleep and testing. Participants performed intermediate tests after each learning session plus three final tests 1, 7 and 28 days after the last learning session. Results: (1) Group LST learned 8.5% more vocabulary words than the other groups overall. (2) This odor cueing effect increased across the three days of cued learning. (3) We found no clear evidence for effects of odor cueing on the forgetting dynamics. Our findings support the notion of a beneficial effect of odor cueing. They further suggest to use at least 3 days and nights of odor cueing. Overall, this study indicates that there is an easy, efficient and economical way to enhance memory performance in daily life.

  • Spaced learning produces better learning performance than extended learning periods without or with little interruptions. This "spacing effect" exists on different time scales, ranging from seconds to months. We recently found large spacing effects with a hitherto rarely investigated 12-hours spacing interval. The present study tested for potentially larger learning effects in the temporal vicinity of 12 h and analyzed spacing effects separately for learning and forgetting. 102 participants learned 40 German-Japanese vocabulary pairs in separate conditions with 7.5 min and 4-, 8-, 12-, and 24-hours spacing intervals. Two final tests were executed after retention intervals of 24 h and 7 days. The 7.5-min spacing interval produced a steeper initial learning curve than all other spacing intervals. 24 h after the last learning unit, we found almost no forgetting in the 4-, 8- and 12-hours spacing conditions, but about 9.3% and 3.6% forgetting in the 7.5 min and 24 h spacing conditions. After 7 days, forgetting was in the range of 13% for all conditions between 4 and 24 h. The 7.5 min condition produced 34% forgetting. Our results indicate that spacing intervals in the range of 8 h ± 4 h provide high learning performance and can be easily integrated in our daily schedules.

  • In two studies, we investigated the influence of aversive and nonaversive reinforcers on startle reactivity, visceral responses, and self-report during Pavlovian conditioning. Furthermore, we assessed how awareness of the stimulus contingencies affect conditioned discrimination in the different response systems. Conditioned potentiation of the startle response was only observed in the context of aversive learning. Moreover, blink potentiation occurred without awareness of the relationship between the conditioned and unconditioned stimulus. In contrast, skin conductance conditioning was independent of the aversiveness of the reinforcer and was only obtained for those individuals who could correctly verbalize the stimulus contingency in a postconditioning recognition test. Cardiac responses varied with the task demands of the situation and covaried with individual response stereotypes.

Last update from database: 04.06.25, 15:35 (UTC)