Ihre Suche

Suche zurücksetzen
Team
Thema

Ergebnisse 4 Einträge

Neueste zuerstÄlteste zuerstAutor A-ZAutor Z-ATitel A-ZTitel Z-A
Abstracts
  • Tabbert, K., Merz, C. J., Klucken, T., Schweckendiek, J., Vaitl, D., Wolf, O. T., & Stark, R. (2011). Influence of contingency awareness on neural, electrodermal and evaluative responses during fear conditioning. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 6(4), 495–506. https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsq070

    In an fMRI study, effects of contingency awareness on conditioned responses were assessed in three groups comprising 118 subjects. A differential fear-conditioning paradigm with visual conditioned stimuli, an electrical unconditioned stimulus and two distractors was applied. The instructed aware group was informed about the contingencies, whereas the distractors prevented contingency detection in the unaware group. The third group (learned aware) was not informed about the contingencies, but learned them despite the distractors. Main effects of contingency awareness on conditioned responses emerged in several brain structures. Post hoc tests revealed differential dorsal anterior cingulate, insula and ventral striatum responses in aware conditioning only, whereas the amygdala was activated independent of contingency awareness. Differential responses of the hippocampus were specifically observed in learned aware subjects, indicating a role in the development of contingency awareness. The orbitofrontal cortex showed varying response patterns: lateral structures showed higher responses in instructed aware than unaware subjects, the opposite was true for medial parts. Conditioned subjective and electrodermal responses emerged only in the two aware groups. These results confirm the independence of conditioned amygdala responses from contingency awareness and indicate specific neural circuits for different aspects of fear acquisition in unaware, learned aware and instructed aware subjects.

  • Tabbert, K., Stark, R., Kirsch, P., & Vaitl, D. (2006). Dissociation of neural responses and skin conductance reactions during fear conditioning with and without awareness of stimulus contingencies. NeuroImage, 32(2), 761–770. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.03.038

    This study investigates the effect of awareness of stimulus contingencies on BOLD responses within the amygdala, the orbitofrontal, and the occipital cortex, and on differential skin conductance responses (SCRs) during fear conditioning. Of two geometric figures, the paired conditioned stimulus (CS+) predicted an electrical stimulus (unconditioned stimulus = UCS), whereas the unpaired conditioned stimulus (CS-) was not followed by the UCS. Awareness of stimulus contingencies was manipulated experimentally, creating an aware and an unaware group: a distracter figure and a working memory task were introduced to conceal the stimulus contingencies of the conditioning paradigm, hence preventing contingency detection in the unaware group. The aware group was informed beforehand about the relation between CS+, CS-, and UCS. Differential SCRs were only obtained in the aware but not in the unaware group. Conversely, we observed enhanced responses of the amygdala, the orbitofrontal, and the occipital cortex to the CS+ in the unaware group only. Thus, we found a dissociation of SCR differentiation and the activation of a neural fear network depending on the presence or absence of awareness. These results support a model of fear conditioning that distinguishes between a more cognitive level of learning, reflected in contingency awareness and differential SCRs, and the awareness independent activation of a fear network.

  • Windmann, S., Kirsch, P., Mier, D., Stark, R., Walter, B., Güntürkün, O., & Vaitl, D. (2006). On framing effects in decision making: linking lateral versus medial orbitofrontal cortex activation to choice outcome processing. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 18(7), 1198–1211. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn.2006.18.7.1198

    Two correlates of outcome processing in the orbitofrontal cortex (OFC) have been proposed in the literature: One hypothesis suggests that the lateral/medial division relates to representation of outcome valence (negative vs. positive), and the other suggests that the medial OFC maintains steady stimulus-outcome associations, whereas the lateral OFC represents changing (unsteady) outcomes to prepare for response shifts. These two hypotheses were contrasted by comparing the original with the inverted version of the Iowa Gambling Task in an event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging experiment. Results showed (1) that (caudo) lateral OFC was indeed sensitive to the steadiness of the outcomes and not merely to outcome valence and (2) that the original and the inverted tasks, although both designed to measure sensitivity for future outcomes, were not equivalent as they enacted different behaviors and brain activation patterns. Results are interpreted in terms of Kahneman and Tversky's prospect theory suggesting that cognitions and decisions are biased differentially when probabilistic future rewards are weighed against consistent punishments relative to the opposite scenario [Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. Choices, values, and frames. American Psychologist, 39, 341-350, 1984]. Specialized processing of unsteady rewards (involving caudolateral OFC) may have developed during evolution in support of goal-related thinking, prospective planning, and problem solving.

  • Junghöfer, M., Schupp, H. T., Stark, R., & Vaitl, D. (2005). Neuroimaging of emotion: empirical effects of proportional global signal scaling in fMRI data analysis. NeuroImage, 25(2), 520–526. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.12.011

    Global variations of BOLD-fMRI signal are often considered as nuisance effects. This unwanted source of variance is commonly eliminated using proportional global signal scaling (PGSS). However, application of PGSS relies on the assumption that global variations of BOLD signal and experimental conditions are uncorrelated. It has been shown for cognitive tasks that the unjustified application of PGSS might greatly distort statistical results. The present study examined this issue in the domain of emotion research. Specifically, fMRI data were obtained in a block-design, while 21 subjects passively viewed high and low emotionally arousing pleasant, unpleasant, and neutral pictures. Violations of the orthogonality assumption were found for analyses of emotional pictures high in arousal, causing dramatically different outcomes when compared to analyses performed without PGSS. Application of PGSS was associated with attenuated emotional activation in visual cortical areas, insensitivity to emotional activations in limbic and paralimbic regions, and widely distributed artificial deactivations. In contrast, the orthogonality assumption was not violated for low arousing emotional materials. Thus, the validity of using PGSS varied as a function of the emotional arousal of the stimuli. Taken together, the unwarranted use of PGSS might contribute to conflicting results in affective neuroscience fMRI studies, in particular with respect to limbic and paralimbic structures.

RIS

Empfohlenes Format für die meisten Literaturverwaltungsprogramme

BibTeX

Empfohlenes Format für BibTeX-fähige software

Custom feed
Last update from database: 04.06.25, 15:35 (UTC)