Ihre Suche
Ergebnisse 2 Einträge
-
Temporally distributed ("spaced") learning can be twice as efficient as massed learning. This "spacing effect" occurs with a broad spectrum of learning materials, with humans of different ages, with non-human vertebrates and also invertebrates. This indicates, that very basic learning mechanisms are at work ("generality"). Although most studies so far focused on very narrow spacing interval ranges, there is some evidence for a non-monotonic behavior of this "spacing effect" ("nonlinearity") with optimal spacing intervals at different time scales. In the current study we focused both the nonlinearity aspect by using a broad range of spacing intervals and the generality aspect by using very different learning/practice domains: Participants learned German-Japanese word pairs and performed visual acuity tests. For each of six groups we used a different spacing interval between learning/practice units from 7 min to 24 h in logarithmic steps. Memory retention was studied in three consecutive final tests, one, seven and 28 days after the final learning unit. For both the vocabulary learning and visual acuity performance we found a highly significant effect of the factor spacing interval on the final test performance. In the 12 h-spacing-group about 85% of the learned words stayed in memory and nearly all of the visual acuity gain was preserved. In the 24 h-spacing-group, in contrast, only about 33% of the learned words were retained and the visual acuity gain dropped to zero. The very similar patterns of results from the two very different learning/practice domains point to similar underlying mechanisms. Further, our results indicate spacing in the range of 12 hours as optimal. A second peak may be around a spacing interval of 20 min but here the data are less clear. We discuss relations between our results and basic learning at the neuronal level.
-
Physiological responses in the Concealed Information Test (CIT) are known to depend on the depth of encoding critical items; CIT questions commonly refer to knowledge about critical items. It is unclear to what extent (1) different modes of item handling in a mock-crime, and (2) alternative questioning formats, e.g. asking about participants' particular actions with the critical items, influence the physiological responses. In the presented mock-crime study with fifty-three participants, two questioning formats, i.e. "Did you see …?" (viewing questioning) and "Did you steal …?" (stealing questioning), were compared between subjects. The mode of encoding, stealing vs. merely viewing the critical objects, was varied within subject. Skin conductance, electrocardiogram, respiration, and finger pulse were recorded. For both questioning formats and each physiological measure, physiological responses to stolen as well as merely viewed objects differed from those to irrelevant objects. Considering viewing questioning, responses to stolen and merely viewed objects did not differ, with the exception of greater phasic decreases of heart rate for stolen objects. Considering stealing questioning, responses to stolen objects exceeded those to merely viewed objects with each physiological measure. The statistically proven interaction between mode of encoding a particular object and questioning format sheds light on the factors influencing the physiological responses in a CIT. The level of subjective significance of a particular item might emerge interactively from the mode of item handling and the questioning format.
Erkunden
Eintragsart
Sprache
- Englisch (2)
Thema
- Memory/physiology
- Adult (2)
- Crime/psychology (1)
- Electrocardiography (1)
- Female (2)
- Fingers/blood supply (1)
- Galvanic Skin Response/physiology (1)
- Heart Rate/physiology (1)
- Humans (2)
- Language (1)