Vollständige Literaturliste

Physiological responses in the Concealed Information Test (CIT) are known to depend on the depth of encoding critical items; CIT questions commonly refer to knowledge about critical items. It is unclear to what extent (1) different modes of item handling in a mock-crime, and (2) alternative questioning formats, e.g. asking about participants' particular actions with the critical items, influence the physiological responses. In the presented mock-crime study with fifty-three participants, two questioning formats, i.e. "Did you see …?" (viewing questioning) and "Did you steal …?" (stealing questioning), were compared between subjects. The mode of encoding, stealing vs. merely viewing the critical objects, was varied within subject. Skin conductance, electrocardiogram, respiration, and finger pulse were recorded. For both questioning formats and each physiological measure, physiological responses to stolen as well as merely viewed objects differed from those to irrelevant objects. Considering viewing questioning, responses to stolen and merely viewed objects did not differ, with the exception of greater phasic decreases of heart rate for stolen objects. Considering stealing questioning, responses to stolen objects exceeded those to merely viewed objects with each physiological measure. The statistically proven interaction between mode of encoding a particular object and questioning format sheds light on the factors influencing the physiological responses in a CIT. The level of subjective significance of a particular item might emerge interactively from the mode of item handling and the questioning format.

Place: Netherlands PMID: 21803080